a letter to a square

A Letter To A Square The nut of the statement comes down to I take drugs and believe that biochemical theory will soon converge on the fact that we simply cannot alter (read: improve) human consciousness without altering some kind of biochemical. The kinds of experiences available to those that pray, meditate, or contemplate are far more accessible when having consumed a consciousness expanding substance, although much internal biochemistry can be manipulated by normal interactions with consciousness, there are some doors that remain locked to those without the right keys, the key might be a concept or a plain old fashioned, peer-pressure-prescribed-prohibited, drug. CANNABIS Cannabis descends from a plant that once had its capabilities, although not quite as strong nor as diverse as it is presently, that was the same plant as that of hops and hemp, meaning that our culture of drinking, sail boating, net fishing and writing were all once entwined with a culture of getting high before it was first banned in the 20s. It was banned because the front of products that bordered its competition teamed up and used their means of power to an ends of pure power rather than an ends of good, as is an inevitable side-effect of presence creating knowledge creating money creating power. This is were vigilance comes in, or in theosophically equivalent terms, karma: the future after an interplay of incentives for reaction. THE BLACK MARKET Banning a substance that will be used anyway, leads to the avoidance of tax for most associated pseudo-employees, this leads to an economic advantage to those that do, this generates the incentive for illegal users to maintain the ban. What does this mean? The act of banning any particular substance for any particular reason is likely to be maintained even if the banning is not obeyed. Thus, it takes a long time and a lot of risk for each individual to change their mind and for the numbers that change their mind to build up in support of using the substance. There exists addicts, ie those that use a substance that they believe is bad, but there also exists people that use a substance while believing it is not bad. It is surprising how many people there are that are seen as addicts but are actually just users. WHAT MAKES A DRUG BAD? Firstly, as lawyers can tell you, you are going to have to define drug. The common use of terms when discussing this situation to the public is to habituate this conceptualization of a drug. Why that is, I'm not exactly sure other than that Black Market incentive, but the nature of mainstream religions often leads to an over-abundance of perceived agreement without much actually completed discussions, so each person ends up believing drugs are bad because they thought that is what good people think, but each good person thinks it for the same reasons as the first person. The funny thing about consciousness expansion is that you have to be able to expand your consciousness enough to know what consciousness is in order for you to think you should expand it. And you are not going to know that LSD, Psilocybin and Cannabis expand your consciousness without knowing either one of two things, what it is like to take it (ie. take it, but, take it easy), or what it is like for other people to take it (science). And we can't do science without doing it in a legitimate fashion, and we can't do science legitimately until we legalise the substance Even if you could define a drug, you cannot know that a drug is bad without having completed the science or made up your own mind. But hear this, most minds are made up by others by way of esteem camouflaging power and the inevitable incentive to obey power outrightly. A CONCEPTUAL NIGHTMARE It could be that the only people who project the idea that drugs are bad are those that avoid tax by dealing drugs. But of course, where all the money goes for the product: the rich bikie gangs, well, they will not pay for it to be advertised enough to become legal because otherwise they would not exist, it would be shooting yourself in the foot. Many many times have people shot themselves in the foot, but for almost 100 years, the bikies have managed to maintain the consciousness to know not to bite the hand that feeds you, and they have not destroyed each other yet. So all it takes is for the actual Users, who do not make money off the drug, to actually band together under common agreement on which drugs are actually bad and make movement on the polls without being able to afford advertising.

Viewcount: 249
Post viewcount: 21882 Views

abstracting metaphor

Viewcount: 250

a letter to a consciousness

Viewcount: 441

a letter to a nihilist

Viewcount: 299

a letter to a politician

Viewcount: 228

a letter to a square

Viewcount: 249

any years resolution

Viewcount: 378

axioms empty set

Viewcount: 249

Beliefs be leaves on a tree

Viewcount: 540

building sandcastles

Viewcount: 233

case reports

Viewcount: 243

cleaning up after priors

Viewcount: 204

cognitive fallacies

Viewcount: 241

creating morality

Viewcount: 238

dear god

Viewcount: 234

escaping from reality

Viewcount: 222

ever present metaphors

Viewcount: 232

every story as a story

Viewcount: 236

explore the body

Viewcount: 252

freedom as a negative concept

Viewcount: 204


Viewcount: 221

future human sex

Viewcount: 313


Viewcount: 388

god a non npc

Viewcount: 571

having the drug talk

Viewcount: 270


Viewcount: 239

hermeneutics - interpretation

Viewcount: 245

hitchen's razor

Viewcount: 614

how can i learn more about psychoactive drugs

Viewcount: 208

how does good

Viewcount: 322

how i meditate where it gets me

Viewcount: 226

how psychedelic wake

Viewcount: 333


Viewcount: 207


Viewcount: 220

if singularity, then end of the world

Viewcount: 223


Viewcount: 200

Internet of babel

Viewcount: 209

In The Beginning

Viewcount: 265

is it wrong to think the wrong thing

Viewcount: 188


Viewcount: 263

mental guises

Viewcount: 201

mental hospital

Viewcount: 196

miraculous is magic

Viewcount: 220


Viewcount: 249

my first trip

Viewcount: 320

my second trip

Viewcount: 235

occam's gear

Viewcount: 232

on existence of equality

Viewcount: 178


Viewcount: 205

Out of context

Viewcount: 191


Viewcount: 238

perhaps rest in peace is wrong

Viewcount: 188

podcast reviews

Viewcount: 346

projection bias

Viewcount: 300

proverbs are i told you so's

Viewcount: 293

psychedelics and suicide

Viewcount: 211

purposeful misreading

Viewcount: 202

p vs np

Viewcount: 413

questions about a trip

Viewcount: 271

quotes of the aether

Viewcount: 203

reactionary mindfulness

Viewcount: 199

responsibilities for parents

Viewcount: 211


Viewcount: 348

suicide preventiono

Viewcount: 220


Viewcount: 217

taking a step back

Viewcount: 189

tautology as magic

Viewcount: 211

the anything innate difference

Viewcount: 229

the house of want

Viewcount: 218

the limit of outside the box thinking

Viewcount: 204

the meaning of life

Viewcount: 227

-- the synthing

Viewcount: 214

the system is rigged

Viewcount: 205

thought police

Viewcount: 287

to make a parody of yourself

Viewcount: 226

to say

Viewcount: 225

trickledown economics

Viewcount: 200

trip 3

Viewcount: 188

trip 4

Viewcount: 219

tying up loose ends

Viewcount: 338

ultimately containing complete greediness

Viewcount: 200

What is meaning? Every word could mean anything if said on it's own, in particular: sex.

Viewcount: 199

what is the meaning of life

Viewcount: 209

who am i

Viewcount: 235

why psychedelic wake

Viewcount: 211

woo woo

Viewcount: 211

you're not going to notice it

Viewcount: 252